Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  85 / 242 Next Page
Show Menu
Previous Page 85 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

85

MIDAZOLAM/FENTANYL, PROPOFOL/ALFENTANIL OR ALFENTANIL ONLY FOR COLONOSCOPY

7

INTRODUCTION

The number of colonoscopies has grown considerably (64%) in recent years,

1

and it will

continue to rise in the next years.

2

Most colonoscopies are performed under conscious or deep sedation. Sedation has

traditionally been provided by gastroenterologists and is typically achieved with

benzodiazepines. However, benzodiazepines often do not provide sufficient patient

comfort during painful interventions.

3

Therefore, opioids are often added. This combination

prolongs the duration of the sedative effect, resulting in delayed discharge.

4

Nonetheless,

this sedation regimen is still frequently used.

5

An important step in the evolution of procedural sedation was the introduction of propofol.

Propofol, with its fast on- andoffset of action and its high level of satisfaction achieved among

gastroenterologists and patients, seems an ideal choice for endoscopic interventions.

6

The most serious disadvantage, however, of propofol sedation is the risk to progress from

moderate to deep sedation with consecutive airway compromise and cardiopulmonary

depression.

7

Therefore, its application in the US still is limited to anaesthesia providers.

That’s why, anaesthesia professional participation in endoscopic procedures is expected to

grow from 23% in 2007 to 53.4% in 2015 (United States).

8

The aim of our study was to find

an alternative regime facilitating sedation for colonoscopy in a satisfactory and safe manner

for patients and endoscopists in a teaching hospital.

Alfentanil could be such an alternative. Alfentanil provides analgesia and leads to mild

sedation with the patient still able to communicate. Moreover, all actions of alfentanil can be

immediately reversed by naloxone, making it safer in the hands of non-anaesthesiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ethics committee of the Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, approved the

protocol for this prospective randomised controlled trial (NL 31863), EudraCT 2010-020502-

15, and ISRCTN Register: ISRCTN 83950185).

In the AMC, colonoscopies are routine procedures performed at different intervention

sites of the Department of Gastroenterology. Randomly, we selected 55 colonoscopy days

within a 5-month period at one of our three colonoscopy suites. Four hundred and eight

patients were eligible. Due to overlap in time between the procedures, 242 patients were

asked for participation, 62 patients refused, and after providing written informed consent,

the eligible patients (n=180) were randomised per working day to one of the following

study arms: midazolam/fentanyl (group M, n=60), alfentanil (group A, n=60), and propofol/

alfentanil (group P, n=60).

Patients were blinded to the sedation regimen. Sedation was either performed by a

gastroenterology nurse (without anaesthesia personnel participation), or by an anaesthesia