Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  88 / 242 Next Page
Show Menu
Previous Page 88 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

88

Chapter 7

is 10. Patients scoring > 9 or meeting the pre-procedure score were considered ready for

discharge.

Patients were finally declared ready for discharge if they were awake with stable

haemodynamics and without side effects (nausea), and able to walk around without

assistance.

A follow-up telephone call was made on the next day. Patients were asked about their

global satisfaction with the procedure (part 2 PSSI) and about their willingness to undergo

colonoscopy with the same sedation regimen again if required.

Statistics

With a true difference between two groups of 0.5 on the 7-point satisfaction scores and a

standard deviation of 1 (based on the literature),

11

a sample size of 54 subjects per group

was necessary to demonstrate a statistical significance for global patient satisfaction at an

alpha of 0.05 and a 1 - beta of 0.8. Concerning a dropout rate of 10%, the estimated sample

size was 180 patients.

Statistical analyses were performed using PASW statistics (version 18.0). All data had been

checked for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The three groups

were compared using an ANOVA or Kruska–Wallis with a step-down post hoc adjustment,

or a Mann–Whitney U test (for differences between two groups), where appropriate. Data

are presented as mean ± SD or median/25/75 percentile. P<0.05 was considered statistically

significant.

RESULTS

The three groups did not significantly differ in baseline demographics and clinical features

regarding gender, age, length, weight, body mass index, smoking, and drinking habits

(Table 1).

Before the procedure, patients in all groups reported similar expectations regarding pain:

group M expected mean (SD) of 4.1±2.6 NRS points, group A of 4.1±2.4, and group P of

4.1±2.6.

All colonoscopy procedures were completed without adverse events and the final

endoscopic diagnosis showed no significant differences between groups (data not shown).

Duration of the endoscopic procedures (mean (SD)) was 38±13 min with no significant

differences between groups.

Patients in group M received mean (SD) 3.9±1.5 mg midazolam and 67±29 μg fentanyl,

in group A 1203±468 μg alfentanil was used, and in group P 232±127 μg alfentanil and

442±177 mg propofol was given.