Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  80 / 242 Next Page
Show Menu
Previous Page 80 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

80

Chapter 6

REFERENCES

1.

Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps

and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level

reporting.

Radiology 2005; 237: 893–904

2.

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy

for detection – systematic review and meta-analysis.

Radiology 2011; 259: 393–405

3.

Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy

and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.

Gut 2009; 58: 241–248

4.

Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of

advanced neoplasia.

N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1403–1412

5.

Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large

adenomas and cancers.

N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1207–1217

6.

De Haan MC, Van Gelder RE, Graser A, et al. Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to

colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis.

Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1747–1763

7.

Jover R, Herraiz M, Alarcon O, et al. Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal

cancer screening.

Endoscopy 2012; 44: 444–451

8.

McFarland EG, Levin B, Lieberman DA, et al. Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort

of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and American

College of Radiology.

Radiology 2008; 248: 717–720

9.

Stoop EM, De Haan MC, De Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus

non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised

controlled trial.

Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 55–64

10. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. Optimisation of CT colonography technique: prospective

trial in 180 patients.

Radiology 2000; 216: 704–711

11. Akerkar GA, Yee J, Hung R, McQuaid K. Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer

screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy.

Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 310–315

12. Jung HS, Park DK, Kim MJ, et al. A comparison of patient acceptance and preferences between CT

colonography and conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Korean J Intern Med 2009; 24: 43–47

13. Jensch S, Bipat S, Peringa J, et al. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective

assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with

cathartic bowel preparation.

Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 146–156

14. Van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J, et al. CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient

preference in a 5-week follow-up study.

Radiology 2004; 233: 328–337