Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  124 / 242 Next Page
Show Menu
Previous Page 124 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

124

Chapter 9

17. Jalowiecki P, Rudner R, Gonciarz M, et al. Sole use of dexmedetomidine has limited utility for

conscious sedation during outpatient colonoscopy.

Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 269–273

18. Pascoe G. Patient satisfactions in primary healthcare: a literature review and analysis.

Eval Progr Plann 1983; 6: 185–210

19. Walder B, Maillard J, Lubbeke A. Minimal clinically important difference.

Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32: 77– 78

20. Muller S, Borowics SM, Fortis EA, et al. Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine alone is less than

propofol for conscious sedation during ERCP.

Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 651– 659

21. Zeyneloglu P, Pirat A, Candan S, et al. Dexmedetomidine causes prolonged recovery when

compared with midazolam/fentanyl combination in outpatient shock wave lithotripsy.

Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25: 961– 967

22. Chernik D, Gillings D, Laine H. Validity and reliability of the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/

Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam.

J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 10: 244– 251