

113
SATISFACTION AND SAFETY USING DEXMEDETOMIDINE OR PROPOFOL SEDATION
9
INTRODUCTION
Dexmedetomidine is a short-acting selective post-synaptic α
2
-agonists with anxiolytic
and hypnotic properties.
1,2
Patients receiving dexmedetomidine seem to be in a hypnotic
state but are easily arousable by verbal or tactile stimuli. Dexmedetomidine also decreases
requirements for other anaesthetics and analgesics and provides a diminished sympathetic
response to stress, leading finally to haemodynamic stability with no clinically important
respiratory side effects. However, sympatholysis can cause hypotension and bradycardia.
Dexmedetomidine seems to be an alternative option for sedation during endoscopic
outpatient procedures.
Propofol is a powerful sedative that has gained the role as the ‘gold standard’ for moderate
to deep procedural sedation because of its rapid onset and termination of action, and
the high level of satisfaction achieved among patients and gastroenterologists. Its most
important disadvantage is the risk of a rapid change from conscious to deep sedation with
the possibility of respiratory depression or airway obstruction leading to hypoxaemia and
cardiovascular depression.
3,4
Several trials have compared dexmedetomidine sedation with propofol in various
procedures with contradictory results.
5,6
No study has previously investigated these two
drugs in the setting of endoscopic oesophageal procedures under conscious sedation. The
primary aim of the current study was to estimate satisfaction of patients and endoscopists
associated with endoscopic oesophageal procedures conducted during sedation with
dexmedetomidine or propofol. As a secondary outcome, we estimated safety of sedation
with regard to haemodynamic and respiratory effects.
METHODS
Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the Academic Medical
Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Chairperson Dr. M. Trip) (NL36861.018.11) on
12 January 2012.
All authors had access to the study data and reviewed and approved the final article.
A randomised controlled trial was performed. In the AMC, endoscopic oesophageal
procedures are routinely performed by two experienced endoscopists on Mondays and
Fridays in one intervention suite at the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
During the period between July 2012 and August 2013, all included patients were submitted
to either dexmedetomidine or propofol sedation 1:1 by random computer selection. The
study flow chart is shown in Figure 1.