Esmée Tensen

43 TWO DECADES OF TELEDERMATOLOGY 21. Landow SM, Oh DH, Weinstock MA. Teledermatology within the Veterans Health Administration, 2002-2014. Telemed J E Health 2015;21(10):769-773. 22. Romero G, Garrido JA, García-Arpa M. Telemedicine and teledermatology (I): concepts and applications. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2008;99:506-522. 23. Pak HS. Implementing a teledermatology programme. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11(6):285-293. 24. Center for telehealth and e-health law. URL: http://ctel.org/expertise/reimbursement/ reimbursement-overview/ [accessed 2016-01-12]. 25. World Health Organization. Telemedicine, opportunities and developments in member states: report on the second global survey on eHealth. 2010. ISBN 978 92 4 156414 4. URL: http:// www.who.int/goe/publications/ehealth_series_vol2/en/ [accessed 2015-12-28]. 26. Foley. 2014 Telemedicine survey, executive summary November 2014. 27. Prins M, Hek K, Verberne L, Nielen M, Opperhuizen G, Verheij R. Rapport: Zorg door de huisarts, jaarcijfers 2014 en trendcijfers 2010-2014 (Report: care by the General Practitioner), Netherlands institute for health services research (NIVEL), 2015. 28. Ksyos homepage. Ksyos. URL: https://www.ksyos.nl/ [accessed 2016-01-12]. 29. Ogbechie OA, Nambudiri VE, Vleugels RA. Teledermatology perception differences between urban primary care physicians and dermatologists. JAMA Dermatol 2015;151(3):339-340. 30. Armstrong AW, Kwong MW, Chase EP, Ledo L, Nesbitt TS, Shewry SL. Why some dermatologists do not practice store-and-forward teledermatology. Arch Dermatol 2012;148(5):649-650. 31. Chanussot-Deprez C, Contreras-Ruiz J. Telemedicine in wound care: a review. Adv Skin Wound Care 2013;26(2):78-82. 32. Moreno-Ramirez D, Ferrándiz L. A 10-year history of teledermatology for skin cancer management. JAMA Dermatol 2015;151(12):1289-1290. 33. Thomas J, Kumar P. The scope of teledermatology in India. Indian Dermatol Online J 2013;4(2):82-89. 34. ISO/TS 13131:2014 Health Informatics—Telehealth services—quality planning guidelines. URL: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=53052 [accessed 2016-01-10]. 35. ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Information technology—security techniques—information security management systems—requirements. URL: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_ detail?csnumber=54534 [accessed 2016-01-10]. 36. Orruño E, Gagnon MP, Asua J, Ben AA. Evaluation of teledermatology adoption by healthcare professionals using a modified technology acceptance model. J Telemed Telecare 2011;17(6):303-307. 37. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13(3):319-340. 38. Edison KE, Dyer JA, Whited JD, Mutrux R. Practice gaps. The barriers and the promise of teledermatology. Arch Dermatol 2012;148(5):650-651. 39. Quigley EA, Tokay BA, Jewell ST, Marchetti MA, Halpern AC. Technology and technique standards for camera-acquired digital dermatologic images: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol 2015;151(8):883-890. 40. Bittorf A, Fartasch M, Schuler G, Diepgen TL. Resolution requirements for digital images in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997;37(2 Pt 1):195-198. 2

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw