Alexander Beulens

106 Chapter 3 1. Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O. 30 Years of Robotic Surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2550– 7. 2. Dutch Health inspectorate (Inspectie voor de gezondheidszorg). Insufficient carefulness at the introduction of surgical robots (in Dutch: Onvoldoende zorgvuldigheid bij introductie van operatierobots). Igz. 2010; 3. Khan R, Aydin A, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Simulation-based training for prostate surgery. BJU Int [Internet]. 2015 Oct 1 [cited 2018 Mar 27];116(4):665–74. 4. Jaeken M, Zech E, Brison C, Verhofstadt LL, Van Broeck N, Mikolajczak M. Helpers’ Self-Assessment Biases Before and after Helping Skills Training. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Mar 22];8:1377. 5. Porte PJ, Verweij L., Bekkers RL., Consten EC., Lichtenberg H, van der Poel HG, van Swol CFP, Wagner C. Robotic surgery for medical specialists, basic proficiency requirements for the safe use of robotic surgery. Utrecht/Amsterdam: NIVEL/EMGO+ [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Aug 22]; 6. Brinkman W, de Angst I, Schreuder H, Schout B, Draaisma W, Verweij L, Hendrikx A, van der Poel H. Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach? Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2017;31(1):281–7. 7. Rehman S, Raza SJ, Stegemann AP, Zeeck K, Din R, Llewellyn A, Dio L, Trznadel M, Seo YW, Chowriappa AJ, Kesavadas T, Ahmed K, Guru KA. Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: A health economic evaluation. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2013;11(9):841–6. 8. Larcher A, Turri F, Bianchi L, Dell’Oglio P, Collins J, Capitanio U, Montorsi F, Mottrie A. Virtual Reality Validation of the ERUS Simulation-based Training Programmes: Results from a High-volume Training Centre for Robot-assisted Surgery. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2019;75(5):885–7. 9. Goldenberg MG, Lee JY, Kwong JCC, Grantcharov TP, Costello A. Implementing assessments of robot-assisted technical skill in urological education: a systematic review and synthesis of the validity evidence. Vol. 122, BJU International. 2018. 10. Watkinson W, Raison N, Abe T, Harrison P, Khan S, Van der Poel H, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Establishing objective benchmarks in robotic virtual reality simulation at the level of a competent surgeon using the RobotiX Mentor simulator. Postgrad Med J [Internet]. 2018;postgradmedj-2017-135351. 11. Lovegrove CE, Elhage O, Khan MS, Novara G, Mottrie A, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Training Modalities in Robot-assisted Urologic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus [Internet]. 2017;3(1):102–16. 12. Puliatti S, Mazzone E, Dell’Oglio P. Training in robot-assisted surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(1):65–72. 13. Harrison P, Raison N, Abe T, Watkinson W, Dar F, Challacombe B, Van Der Poel H, Khan MS, Dasgupa P, Ahmed K. The Validation of a Novel Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Virtual Reality Module. J Surg Educ [Internet]. 2018;75(3):758–66. 14. Shim JS, Kim JY, Pyun JH, Cho S, Oh MM, Kang SH, Lee JG, Kim JJ, Cheon J, Kang SG. Comparison of effective teaching methods to achieve skill acquisition using a robotic virtual reality simulator Expert proctoring versus an educational video versus independent training. Med (United States). 2018;97(51):1–5. 15. Schreuder HWRR, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, Schijven MP, Verheijen RHMM. Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: A systematic review. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2012 Jan [cited 2017 Dec 5];119(2):137–49. 16. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, McDougall EM. Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol [Internet]. 2011;185(4):1191– 7. 17. Wijewickrema S, Zhou Y, Bailey J, Kennedy G, O’Leary S. Provision of automated step-by-step procedural guidance in virtual reality surgery simulation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology - VRST ’16 [Internet]. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2016 [cited 2020 Apr 20]. p. 69–72. 18. Sweller J. Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning - Sweller - 2010 - Cognitive Science - Wiley Online Library. Cogn Sci [Internet]. 1988;285:257–85. 19. Andersen SAW, Mikkelsen PT, Konge L, Cayé-Thomasen P, Sørensen MS. Cognitive load in distributed and massed practice in virtual reality mastoidectomy simulation. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(2):E74–9. 20. Meier M, Horton K, John H. Da Vinci© Skills SimulatorTM: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible? J Robot Surg. 2016;10(4):289– 96. 21. Andersen SAW, Konge L, Cayé-Thomasen P, Sørensen MS. Learning curves of virtual mastoidectomy in distributed and massed practice. JAMA Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(10):913–8. 22. Mackay S, Morgan P, Datta V, Chang A, Darzi A. Practice distribution in procedural skills training: A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2002;16(6):957–61. 23. Ritter FE, Yeh MKC, Yan Y, Siu KC, Oleynikov D. Effects of Varied Surgical Simulation Training Schedules on Motor-Skill Acquisition. Surg Innov. 2020;27(1):68–80. References