Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  68 / 242 Next Page
Show Menu
Previous Page 68 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

68

Chapter 6

METHODS

Design

We performed a prospective multi-centre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled

trial to evaluate whether a single bolus intravenous alfentanil has a clinically relevant

analgesic effect in patients scheduled for elective CT colonography. We evaluated possible

differences between alfentanil and placebo at different time points. This study was

approved by the institutional review board of the Academic Medical Centre; all participants

gave their written informed consent. The study protocol has previously been described

in detail

29

and the trial was registered in the Dutch Trial Register: NTR2902. The study was

conducted in accordance with the protocol and in compliance with the moral, ethical,

and scientific principles governing clinical research as set out in the Declaration of Helsinki

(1989) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The CONSORT 2010 Statement was used as guide

for our reporting.

30

Outcomes measures

The primary outcome was the difference in maximum pain score between patients

receiving alfentanil compared with placebo. We had defined a clinically relevant effect as a

pain reduction of at least 1.3 point on an 11-point numeric rating scale, as this is considered

the minimally important difference using this scale.

26-28

Secondary outcome measures were differences between patients receiving alfentanil

and placebo regarding: pain scores per insufflation position, pain and burden of the CT

colonography procedure and individual CT colonography aspects (e.g. insufflation, bowel

preparation etc.), side effects, vital parameters, procedure time, and recovery time.

Population

Consecutive patients aged 18–85 years and scheduled for elective CT colonography were

assessed for eligibility in two institutions in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Academic Medical

Centre, University of Amsterdam (academic institution) and Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

(teaching hospital). Patients were assessed for eligibility by telephone by one of the research

physicians (T.N.B., M.P.P. or L.J.S.). CT colonography was performed in symptomatic and

surveillance patients only. We used the following exclusion criteria: heart rate < 50 beats per

minute; systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg; severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;

liver disease defined as a Child-Pugh score of > 4; alfentanil allergy; pregnancy; increased

intracranial pressure; use of MAO-inhibitors within two weeks before CT colonography;

daily use of barbiturates, opiates, or benzodiazepines.