Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  147 / 242 Next Page
Show Menu
Previous Page 147 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

147

A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED MULTICENTRE TRIAL

11

distributed, continuous variables an independent Student’s t-test will be used, and the

variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Not normally distributed

data will be compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test where appropriate, and data will

be presented by the median and interquartile range (IQR). For categorical variables, cross

tabulation and the Pearson`s chi-squared test will be applied and variables will be allegorised

as number and/or percentage of the total. To compare the continuous measurements of

HR, NIPD, and SpO

2

between both groups, the area under the curve (AUC) for each value

will be calculated over the different measurement time points during the procedure. A

p-value< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Confidence intervals will be

mentioned where appropriate.

Ethical approval

This trial is conducted in accordance with the protocol and in compliance with the moral,

ethical, and scientific principles governing clinical research as set out in the Declaration

of Helsinki (1989) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). It is registered in the Nederland’s Trial

Register (NTR5486). Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of

the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherland (NL). The National Authority, the

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO), performed a marginal

review and there were no objections to perform this study (NL53999.018.15).

DISCUSSION

Propofol combined with an opioid replaces more and more benzodiazepines for sedation

during ERCP. It is in themeantime the standard sedative agent due to a better titration of the

different sedation levels, shorter recovery time, and more patient satisfaction. However, a

serious drawback of propofol/opioid sedation is that sedation level can rapidly chance from

moderate to deep sedation, or even to general anaesthesia. Here, skilled airway support,

which is not easy to perform in the prone position, may be required to prevent hypoxaemia.

Cote et al. showed that in 12.8% (n=102) patients hypoxaemia occurred during propofol

sedation, although propofol was administered by trained anaesthesia nurses.

10

In 14.4%

of the patients, tactile airway manoeuvres were necessary. Minimising respiratory risks is

therefore important, to make sedation safer. A possible approach can be, to reduce the

propofol dosage using the combination with other substances.

Previous studies usedpropofol combinedwithmidazolamfor ERCP sedation.

11,12

Thismethod

significantly reduced the total amount of propofol required for sedation. Nevertheless, the

synergistic sedation effects of both drugs increased the likelihood of respiratory depression

and prolonged recovery timewithout any analgesic effect. Esketamine offers the advantages

of minimising these side effects, making optimal use of the concept of synergy whilst being