88 Chapter 3 37. Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C. Midwives’ and obstetricians’ perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: An integrative review. Women Birth. 2016;29(2):107-16. doi: S1871-5192(15)00291-7 [pii];10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.010. 38. Mead MM, Kornbrot D. The influence of maternity units’ intrapartum intervention rates and midwives’ risk perception for women suitable for midwifery-led care. Midwifery. 2004;20(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/S0266-6138(03)00054-8 [doi];S0266613803000548 [pii]. 39. Page M, Mander R. Intrapartum uncertainty: a feature of normal birth, as experienced by midwives in Scotland. Midwifery. 2014;30(1):28-35. doi: S02666138(13)00048-X [pii];10.1016/j.midw.2013.01.012. 40. Offerhaus PM, Otten W, Boxem-Tiemessen JC, de JA, KM vdP-dB, Scheepers PL, et al. Variation in intrapartum referral rates in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment. Midwifery. 2015;31(4):e69-e78. doi: S0266-6138(15)00026-1 [pii];10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.005. 41. Cromi A, Bonzini M, Uccella S, Serati M, Bogani G, Pozzo N, et al. Provider contribution to an episiotomy risk model. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(18):2201-6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.982087. 42. De Jong JD, Groenewegen PP, Westert GP. Mutual influences of general practitioners in partnerships. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(8):1515-24. doi: S0277953602005488 [pii]. 43. Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3. 44. World Health Organization. Care in Normal Birth: a practical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996. 45. Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, Geerts CC, Prins M, van Diem MT, Klomp T, Lagro-Janssen AL, et al. The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis. Birth. 2013;40(4):247-55. doi: 10.1111/ birt.12060. 46. Edqvist M, Hildingsson I, Mollberg M, Lundgren I, Lindgren H. Midwives’ Management during the Second Stage of Labor in Relation to Second-Degree Tears-An Experimental Study. Birth. 2017;44(1):86-94. doi: 10.1111/birt.12267. 47. Aasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Reinar LM, Lukasse M. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD006672. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub3. 48. Poulsen MO, Madsen ML, Skriver-Moller AC, Overgaard C. Does the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature. BMJ Open. 2015;5(9):e008346. doi: bmjopen-2015-008346 [pii];10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008346. 49. Fok WY, Leung TY, Tsui MH, Leung TN, Lau TK. Fetal hemodynamic changes after amniotomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(2):166-9. doi: AOG700 [pii];10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00700.x. 50. Petersen A, Poetter U, Michelsen C, Gross MM. The sequence of intrapartum interventions: a descriptive approach to the cascade of interventions. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(2):245-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2737-8.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw