87 Regional variations in childbirth interventions and their correlations 26. Offerhaus PM, De Jonge A, Van der Pal-De Bruin KM, Hukkelhoven CW, Scheepers PL, Lagro-Janssen AL. Change in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands in 2000-2008: a descriptive study of caesarean sections and other interventions among 789,795 low risk births. Midwifery. 2014;30(5):560-6. doi: S02666138(13)00186-1 [pii];10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.013. 27. Stuurgroep ZWANGERSCHAP EN GEBOORTE. Een goed begin. Veilige zorg rond zwangerschap en geboorte. Utrecht; 2009. 28. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129-45. doi: S01406736(14)60789-3 [pii];10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3. 29. Meray N, Reitsma JB, Ravelli AC, Bonsel GJ. Probabilistic record linkage is a valid and transparent tool to combine databases without a patient identification number. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(9):883-91. doi: S0895-4356(06)00500-2 [pii];10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.021. 30. De Jonge A, Wouters M, Klinkert J, Brandenbarg J, Zwart JJ, van DJ, et al. Pitfalls in the use of register-based data for comparing adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in different birth settings. BJOG. 2017;124(10):1477-80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14676. 31. The BMJ. 11. Correlation and regression. The BMJ [Internet]. 2018 15/7/2019. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/ statistics-square-one/11-correlation-and-regression. 32. Carmo LM, Pereira AP, Domingues RM, Theme Filha MM, Dias MA, NakamuraPereira M, et al. Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30 Suppl 1:S1-16. doi: S0102311X2014000700005 [pii]. 33. Lutomski JE, Morrison JJ, Lydon-Rochelle MT. Regional variation in obstetrical intervention for hospital birth in the Republic of Ireland, 2005-2009. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:123. doi: 1471-2393-12-123 [pii];10.1186/1471-239312-123 [doi]. 34. Chalmers B, Kaczorowski J, O’Brien B, Royle C. Rates of interventions in labor and birth across Canada: findings of the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Birth. 2012;39(3):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00549.x. 35. Goueslard K, Cottenet J, Roussot A, Clesse C, Sagot P, Quantin C. How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):208. Epub 2018/06/06. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1747-8. PubMed PMID: 29866103; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5987447. 36. Schuit E, Hukkelhoven CW, van der Goes BY, Overbeeke I, Moons KG, Mol BW, et al. Risk indicators for referral during labor from community midwife to gynecologist: a prospective cohort study. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2016;29(20):3304-11. Epub 2015/11/26. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1124080. PubMed PMID: 26600182. 3
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw