167 The contribution of regional protocols on practice variation in induction of labor References 1. de Jong JD, Groenewegen PP, Westert GP. Sociological Model for Understanding Medical Practice Variations. In: Medical Practice Variations. Springer US; 2015. p. 1–15. 2. Wennberg JE. Time to tackle unwarranted variations in practice. BMJ. 2011 Mar 17;342:d1513. 3. Atsma F, Elwyn G, Westert G. Understanding unwarranted variation in clinical practice: A focus on network effects, reflective medicine and learning health systems. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2020 May 1;32(4):271–4. 4. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Vol. 388, The Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group; 2016. p. 2176–92. 5. Brabers A (Adriana EM, Nederlands instituut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidszorg (Utrecht). Patient involvement and medical practice variation: can patients be ignored in theories about practice variation? 2018. 6. van Everdingen J. Preventie van diep veneuze trombose en longembolie; een verslag van de Amerikaanse consensusbijeenkomst. Nederlands Tijdschrift Geneeskunde. 1986;130:1369–13670. 7. van Everdingen J. Consensusonwikkeling in de geneeskunde. [Utrecht]; 1988. 8. Sackett D, Richardson W, Rosenberg W, Haynes R. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. 9. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):18–23. 10. Ireland. Health Service Executive. Quality Improvement Division., Ireland. National Clinical Strategy and Programmes Division. HSE national framework for developing policies, procedures, protocols and guidelines (PPPGs). 68 p. 11. van Everdingen J, Dreesens D, Burgers J, Swinkels J, van Barneveld T, van der Weijden T. Handboek evidence-based richtlijnonwikkeling. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2014. 12. Regieraad Kwaliteit van Zorg. Richtlijn voor Richtlijnen. Den Haag; 2012 Mar. 13. Boesveld IC, Valentijn PP, Hitzert M, Hermus MAA, Franx A, de Vries RG, et al. An Approach to measuring Integrated Care within a Maternity Care System: Experiences from the Maternity Care Network Study and the Dutch Birth Centre Study. Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jun 20;17(2):6. 14. College Perinatale Zorg. Zorgstandaard Integrale Geboortezorg Versie 1.2. Utrecht; 2020. 15. Goodarzi B, Seijmonsbergen-Schermers A, Cronie D, van Laerhoven H, van den Akker T, van Kaam AH, et al. (Un)warranted variation in local hospital protocols for neonatal referral to the pediatrician: An explorative study in the Netherlands. Birth. 2023 Mar 1;50(1):215–33. 16. Marijnen MC, Damhuis SE, Smies M, Gordijn SJ, Ganzevoort W. Practice variation in diagnosis, monitoring and management of fetal growth restriction in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Sep;276:191–8. 7
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw