111 Experiences, beliefs, and values influencing midwives’ attitude 15. Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, Zondag DC, Nieuwenhuijze M, et al. Regional variations in childbirth interventions and their correlations with adverse outcomes, birthplace and care provider: A nationwide explorative study. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0229488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229488 16. Daemers DOA, van Limbeek EBM, Wijnen HAA, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, de Vries RG. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1511-5 17. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.). Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer, 1985 18. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179-211 19. Muylaert CJ, Sarubbi J, Gallo PR, Neto MLR, Reis AOA. Narrative interviews: an important resource in qualitative research. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014;48 Spec No. 2:184-9. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420140000800027 20. Korstjens U, Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. The European Journal of General Practice. 2018;24(1);9-18 21. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):124551. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388 22. Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, 2020. Accessed November 28, 2021. https://english.ccmo.nl/ 23. Kyngäs H, Mikkonen K, Kääriäinen M. The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research. Springer, 2020 24. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis an Introduction to its Methodology. 4th ed. SAGE publications, 2018 25. Kenens RJ, Batenburg R and Kasteleijn A. Cijfers uit de registratie van verloskundigen – peiling 2016. Nivel, 2017, Utrecht 26. Van Teijlingen E. A Critical Analysis of the Medical Model as used in the Study of Pregnancy and Childbirth. Sociological Research Online. 2005;Volume 10, Issue 2. Doi:10.5153/sro.1034 27. Perriman N, Davis DL, Ferguson S. What women value in the midwifery continuity of care model: a systematic review with meta-synthesis. Midwifery. 2018; 62:220229. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.011 28. Beck U. Risk Society – Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications ltd., 1992 ISBN 9780803983465 29. Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C. Midwives’ and obstetricians’ perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: An integrative review. Women Birth. 2019;29(2):107-16. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.010 30. Scamell M. The fear factor of risk – Clinical governance and midwifery talk and practice in the UK. Midwifery. 2016;38:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.010 31. Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C. A qualitative exploration of how midwives’ and obstetricians’ perception of risk affects care practices for low-risk women and normal birth. Women Birth. 2017;30(5):367-375. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.02.005 4
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw