Denise Spoon

74 Chapter 3 Author, Year Design, Duration in months (Before, Implementation, After) Setting, Ward details, Single or Multi Center Number of Patients (N), LOS, Age, Female patients (%) Number of FPI (Fall prevention Approach) Fall rate before versus after (falls/1000 patient days) Barrier Assessment, Theory, model or framework, if yes which Number of strategies used (from how many ERIC Categories) Stephenson, 2016 Uncontrolled Before-After, 22 (9, 3, 9) General, One medical and one surgical ward from each hospital (9 hospitals), NA, Multi Center NA 4 (Multiple) 3.31 vs 3.38 Yes, Yes, Process model: Getting Research into Practice within JBI PACES 7 (4) Titler, 2016 Uncontrolled Before-After, 18 (3, 15, 0) General, Thirteen adult medicalsurgical units from 3 hospitals were invited to participate in the study, 90-bed, 243-bed and 471-bed, Multi Center NA, NA , 65.6 (SD=2.8), 4 (Multiple) 3.69 vs 2.7 No, Yes, Process model: translation research model (Titler 2010,2001,2009), Theory: Roger's Diffusion of Innovation Framework (rogers, 2010) 14 (4) Visvanathan, 2022 Nonrandomized Stepped Wedge design, 24 (6, 6, 12) Teaching/university/ Academic, South Ground (28–32 beds) at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital (TQEH), SA ; 14-bed Geriatric Evaluation and Management Unit (GEMU) at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (SCGH) in WA ; 32-bed General Medicine (GM) ward at SCGH, NA, Multi Center Control: 1995 Intervention 1244, Control: 11 [7-18] median [IQR] Intervention: 16 [11-24], Control 81.9 ; Intervention 84, Control 54% (1074) Intervention 58% (716) 1 (Single) 6.6 vs 9.3 No, No, 4 (2)

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw