73 Implementation strategies of fall prevention interventions in hospitals: A systematic review 3 Author, Year Design, Duration in months (Before, Implementation, After) Setting, Ward details, Single or Multi Center Number of Patients (N), LOS, Age, Female patients (%) Number of FPI (Fall prevention Approach) Fall rate before versus after (falls/1000 patient days) Barrier Assessment, Theory, model or framework, if yes which Number of strategies used (from how many ERIC Categories) SeminGoosens - Internal, 2003 Uncontrolled Before-After, 25 (6, 12, 7) Teaching/university/ Academic, 32 bed internal medicine ward, 64-bed, Single Center NA 9 (Multiple) 9 vs 8 * Yes, Yes, Process model: Grol 5 step implementation model 10 (5) SeminGoosens - Neuro, 2003 Uncontrolled Before-After 25 (6, 12, 7) Teaching/university/ Academic, 32 bed neurology ward, 64bed, Single Center NA 9 (Multiple) 16 vs 13 * Yes, Yes, Process model: Grol 5 step implementation model 10 (5) Sheppard, 2021 Time series, 33 (18, 2, 8) Teaching/university/ Academic, All 36 wards in the hospital, 1230bed, Single Center NA 8 (Multiple) 6.62 vs 5.89 No, Yes, Evaluation framework: Donabedian’s original framework 4 (3) Silkworth, 2016 Uncontrolled Before-After, 42 (18, 1, 12) Teaching/university/ Academic, Licensed acute care hospital in the Midwest., 434-bed, Single Center NA 2 (Multiple) 3.57 vs 2.02§ No, No, 4 (4) Spano, 2019 Uncontrolled Before-After, 36 (9, 24, 9) General, Magnet- and Planetree designated community hospital located in the northeastern United States, 245 beds, Single Center NA 7 (Multiple) 2.52 vs 1.15 Yes, Yes, Process model: evidence-based practice improvement (EBPI) model developed by Levin and colleagues was used as our method of using evidence-based practice (EBP) to improve patient care. 14 (7)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw