71 Implementation strategies of fall prevention interventions in hospitals: A systematic review 3 Author, Year Design, Duration in months (Before, Implementation, After) Setting, Ward details, Single or Multi Center Number of Patients (N), LOS, Age, Female patients (%) Number of FPI (Fall prevention Approach) Fall rate before versus after (falls/1000 patient days) Barrier Assessment, Theory, model or framework, if yes which Number of strategies used (from how many ERIC Categories) Ohde, 2012 Uncontrolled Before-After, 65 (12, 60, 12) Teaching/university/ Academic, All adult inpatients, with the exception of maternity, preventative health screening patients, and intensive care patients, were included in the study, 520-bed, Single Center NBefore= 164331. NAfter=172325, NBefore= 12,5 (42.9) NAfter= 10.2 (19.5), NBefore= 53.9 (26.5) NAfter= 55.8 (27), NBefore= 51,3% NAfter= 51.1% 9 (Multiple) 2.13 vs 1.53 * No, No, 11 (6) Ploeg, 2018 Uncontrolled Before-After, 24 (8, 12, 12) General, The study setting included three community hospitals in Ontario: two medium-sized hospitals and one small (based on number of beds and admissions; Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2016)., NA, Multi Center NA 14 (Multiple) 6.03 vs 4.97 Yes, Yes, Process model: Framework for mentored guideline implementation and Determinant framework: NHS Sustainability Model 8 (5) Radecki, 2019 Uncontrolled Before-After, 5 (2, 2, 1) Teaching/university/ Academic, A large, urban, academic, level 1 trauma center, NA, Single Center NA 4 (Multiple) 1.50 vs 1.14 No, Yes, Determinant framework: Conceptual model of healthcare service coproduction 6 (6)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw