69 Implementation strategies of fall prevention interventions in hospitals: A systematic review 3 Author, Year Design, Duration in months (Before, Implementation, After) Setting, Ward details, Single or Multi Center Number of Patients (N), LOS, Age, Female patients (%) Number of FPI (Fall prevention Approach) Fall rate before versus after (falls/1000 patient days) Barrier Assessment, Theory, model or framework, if yes which Number of strategies used (from how many ERIC Categories) Lieu, 1997 Uncontrolled Before-After, 36 (12, 12, 12) General, Geriatric ward, 28-bed, Single Center NA, NA , 78,3 +/- 8.4, 5 (Multiple) 6.85 vs 2.94* No, No, 2 (2) Lohse, 2012 Uncontrolled Before-After, 18 (16, , 18) Teaching/university/ Academic, Orthopedic ward, NA, Single Center NA, Before: 3,97 +- 4,07 After: 4,0 +- 4,45, Before: 56,6 +- 32,9 After: 56,8 +-31,6, Before: 51,1% After: 55,7% 8 (Multiple) 4.24 vs 2.53* No, No, 4 (3) Loresto, 2019 Uncontrolled Before-After, 18 (10, 1, 8) General, Medical oncology unit, 36-bed, Single Center NA 4 (Multiple) 3.67 vs 1.36 Yes, No, 5 (3) Luzia, 2018 Retrospective longitudinal study, 60 (12, 24, 12) Teaching/university/ Academic, Surgical, psychiatric and emergency units, 528bed, Single Center NA 4 (Multiple) 1.61 vs 1.42 No, No, 5 (4) Melin, 2017 Uncontrolled Before-After, 6 (3, NA , 3) General, Medicalsurgical unit, 28-bed, Single Center NA 6 (Multiple) 8.67 vs 5.07 § No, Yes, Process model: The Iowa Model of EvidenceBased Practice (EBP) was used to guide the implementation of this quality improvement project. 6 (4)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw