65 Implementation strategies of fall prevention interventions in hospitals: A systematic review 3 Author, Year Design, Duration in months (Before, Implementation, After) Setting, Ward details, Single or Multi Center Number of Patients (N), LOS, Age, Female patients (%) Number of FPI (Fall prevention Approach) Fall rate before versus after (falls/1000 patient days) Barrier Assessment, Theory, model or framework, if yes which Number of strategies used (from how many ERIC Categories) Davis, 2021 Uncontrolled Before-After, 6.5 (5, NA, 1.5) Specialized, orthopedic unit, 30 bed, Single Center N=34 4 (Multiple) 1.8 vs 0§ No, No, 4 (3) Dykes, 2017 Uncontrolled Before-After, (6, NA, 6) General, two large, geographically and ethnically diverse medical centers, NA, Multi Center NA 8 (Multiple) 3.16 vs 2.95 § Yes, Yes, Process model: Framework for Spread - Nolan K, et al. Using a framework for spread: the case of patient access in the Veterans Health Administration. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31:339–347. 13 (7) Dykes, 2020 Nonrandomized Stepped Wedge design, 36 (21, 2, 21) Teaching/university/ Academic, 14 medical units within 3 academic centers, NA, Multi Center NA 5 (multifactorial) 2.92 vs 2.49* Yes, Yes, Evaluation framework RE-AIM 8 (7) France, 2017 Uncontrolled Before-After, 42 (15, NA , 36) Teaching/university/ Academic, Neuroscience acute care, Acute care for the elderly and myelosuppression/ Stem Cell Transplant unit, NA, Single Center NA 10 (Multiple) 5.93 vs 4.8* Yes, Yes, Process model: PDSA (however no reference provided) 11 (5)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw