237 General discussion 8 20. Eccles, M., et al., Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005. 58(2): p. 107-12. 21. Moore, S.A., et al., Specifying and Reporting Implementation Strategies Used in a School-Based Prevention Efficacy Trial. Implement Res Pract, 2021. 2. 22. Holtrop, J.S., et al., Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research. Implementation Science, 2022. 17(1): p. 51. 23. Reddy, S., Generative AI in healthcare: an implementation science informed translational path on application, integration and governance. Implement Sci, 2024. 19(1): p. 27. 24. Sharma, M., et al., Artificial Intelligence Applications in Health Care Practice: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res, 2022. 24(10): p. e40238. 25. Alowais, S.A., et al., Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ, 2023. 23(1): p. 689. 26. Rabiei, R. and S. Almasi, Requirements and challenges of hospital dashboards: a systematic literature review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2022. 22(1): p. 287. 27. Groeneveld, S.W.M., et al., Underestimated Factors Regarding the Use of Technology in Daily Practice of Long-Term Care: Qualitative Study Among Health Care Professionals. JMIR Nursing, 2023. 6: p. e41032. 28. Van de Sande, D., et al., Moving from bytes to bedside: a systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med, 2021. 47(7): p. 750-760. 29. Forsetlund, L., et al., Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021. 9(9): p. CD003030. 30. Potthoff, S., et al., Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services. Health Expect, 2023. 26(5): p. 1997-2012. 31. van der Zanden, M., et al., Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of co-created nursing innovations in a Dutch university hospital. JBI Evid Implement, 2024. 32. Verkerk, E.W., et al., Low-value care in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines. Int J Nurs Stud, 2018. 87: p. 34-39. 33. Laan, B.J., et al., De-implementation strategy to reduce inappropriate use of intravenous and urinary catheters (RICAT): a multicentre, prospective, interrupted time-series and before and after study. Lancet Infect Dis, 2020. 20(7): p. 864-872. 34. Beks, H., et al., Low-value health care, de-implementation, and implications for nursing research: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2024. 156: p. 104780. 35. Kien, C., et al., Effectiveness of de-implementation of low-value healthcare practices: an overview of systematic reviews. Implementation Science, 2024. 19(1): p. 56. 36. Gold, H.T., et al., Cost data in implementation science: categories and approaches to costing. Implementation Science, 2022. 17(1): p. 11. 37. Huis, A., et al., Helping hands: a cluster randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of two different strategies for promoting hand hygiene in hospital nurses. Implement Sci, 2011. 6: p. 101. 38. Hunfeld, N., et al., Circular material flow in the intensive care unit-environmental effects and identification of hotspots. Intensive Care Med, 2023. 49(1): p. 65-74. 39. Bouwes, A., et al., Bachelor of Nursing 2030. 2023, LOOV. 40. Huber, M., et al., Towards a ‘patient-centred’ operationalisation of the new dynamic concept of health: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open, 2016. 6(1): p. e010091. 41. Adriaansen, M. and J. Caris, Bevorderen van gezondheid en gezond gedrag door verpleegkundigen Vol. Eerste herziene editie 2022: Pearson 42. Curran, G.M., Implementation science made too simple: a teaching tool. Implement Sci Commun, 2020. 1: p. 27. 43. Nilsen, P., Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci, 2015. 10: p. 53.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw