106 Chapter 4 Table 5 Process evaluation - Implementation outcomes, Reach, Dose, Fidelity Participants Overall Weight function Fall-detection alarm Head-of-bedangle alarm Chair position Implementation outcome 2020 2023 2020 2023 2020 2023 2020 2023 2020 2023 Number of nurses 116 (%) 93 (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) Reach – did the key users reach all nurses with their available education sessions? % represents nurses stating that they received an educational session 84 (72.4) 57 (61.3) Number of patients 194 206 Reach – availability of the smart beds % represents patients in the smart beds 193 (99.5) 203 (98.5) Number of nurses 116 93 Dose – self-reported quantity of use % represents nurses stating to use this function weekly or more 30 (25.9) 63 (67.7) 38 (32.8) 9 (9.7) 2 (1.7) 5 (5.3) 33 (28.4) 37 (39.8) Number of observed beds 193 203 Dose – observed quantity of use % represents observed beds wherein the function was in use during the observation 1 (0.5) 3 (1.5) 0 (0) 3 (1.5) 0 (0) 8 (3.9) Number of patients 127 242 Dose – questioned quantity of use % represents the patients that had experienced the function in use 16 (12.6) 53 (21.9) 34 (26.7) 51 (21.1) Number of nurses 116 93 Fidelity – self-reported quality of use % represents nurses stating to follow protocol when using the function 87 (75.0) 63 (67.7) 79 (68.1) 46 (41.4) 2 (1.8) 4 (4.3) Number of observed beds 193 203 Fidelity – observed correct use of the smart functions % represents observed use according to protocol 0 (0) 0 (0) * 0 (0) *No fidelity could be observed, function wasn’t in use ND no data >50% 25%-49% <25% ND
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw