161 Automated Quantitative Perfusion CMR With Simplified Dual-Bolus Contrast Protocol 33. Giang, T. H. et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: First European multi-centre experience. Eur. Heart J. 25(18), 1657–1665 (2004). 34. Jerosch-Herold, M., Seethamraju, R. T., Swingen, C. M., Wilke, N. M. & Stillman, A. E. Analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 19(6), 758–770 (2004). 35. Gebker, R. et al. Determinants of myocardial response in CMR perfusion imaging using Gd-BOPTA (Multihance). J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 7(3), 565–572 (2005). 36. Brown, L. A. E. et al. Sex- and age-specifc normal values for automated quantitative pixel-wise myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 24(4), 426– 434 (2023). 37. Biglands, J. D. et al. Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging versus visual analysis in diagnosing myocardial ischemia: A CEMARC substudy. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 11(5), 711–718 (2018). 38. Everaars, H. et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance for evaluating nonculprit lesions afer myocardial infarction: Comparison with fractional fow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 13(3), 715–728 (2020). 39. Ta, A. D. et al. Fully quantitative pixelwise analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion improves discrimination of dark rim artifact from perfusion defects associated with epicardial coronary stenosis. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 20(1), 16 (2018). 7
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw