Chapter 7 142 112. Wichor M. Bramer DG, Gerdien B. de Jonge, Leslie Holland, Tanja Bekhuis. De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. 113. Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:579. 114. Schünemann HJ, Cuello C, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;111:105-14. 115. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898. 116. Murad MH, Mustafa RA, Schünemann HJ, Sultan S, Santesso N. Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect. Evid Based Med 2017;22:85-7. 117. EPOC. Data collection form. EPOC (Effective Practice and Organisation of Care) Resources for review authors. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services 2013. 118. Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ 2020;368:l6890. 119. Higgins JPT GSe. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. 120. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:777-84. 121. Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Systematic Reviews 2021;10:39. 122. Joukhadar R, Meyberg-Solomayer G, Hamza A, et al. A Novel Operative Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Utilizing a MRI-Visible Mesh Implant: Safety and Outcome of Modified Laparoscopic Bilateral Sacropexy. Biomed Research International 2015;2015. 123. Elmantwe ANM, Assar TM. CERVICO–SACROPEXY AND VAGINO–SACROPEXY (CESA & VASA): A NEW PROCEDURES FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE. 124. Cassis C, Mukhopadhyay S, Morris E. Standardizing abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse: One year on. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019;147:49-53. 125. Han L, Wang L, Wang Q, Li H, Zang H. Association between pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence with collagen. Exp Ther Med 2014;7:1337-41. 126. Wein AJ, Rovner ES. Definition and epidemiology of overactive bladder. Urology 2002;60:712; discussion 127. Papa Petros PE. New ambulatory surgical methods using an anatomical classification of urinary dysfunction improve stress, urge and abnormal emptying. International Urogynecology Journal 1997;8:270-7. 128. Petros P. A ligamentous explanation for overactive bladder symptoms as defined by International Continence Society in the female. Cent European J Urol 2018;71:105-7. 129. Luber KM. The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Reviews in urology 2004;6:S3. 130. Larouche M, Belzile E, Geoffrion R. Surgical Management of Symptomatic Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2021;137:1061-73. 131. Gabriel B, Gitsch G, Watermann D, et al. The uterosacral ligament in postmenopausal women with or without pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 2006;25:533-4. 132. Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, Krueger Sullivan L, Schön Ybarra MA, Bent AE. Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:873-9. 133. Dimick JB, Sedrakyan A, McCulloch P. The IDEAL Framework for Evaluating Surgical Innovation: How It Can Be Used to Improve the Quality of Evidence. JAMA Surgery 2019;154:6856. 134. Páez A, Rovers M, Hutchison K, Rogers W, Vasey B, McCulloch P. Beyond the RCT: When are Randomized Trials Unnecessary for New Therapeutic Devices, and What Should We Do Instead? Annals of Surgery 2022;275:324. 135. Ozog Y, Konstantinovic M, Werbrouck E, De Ridder D, Mazza E, Deprest J. Persistence of polypropylene mesh anisotropy after implantation: an experimental study. BJOG 2011;118:1180-5.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw