277 Routinecontrastenemapriortostomareversalseemsonlyrequiredfollowingtreatmentfornecrotizingenterocolitis:Anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofthecontrastenema Chapter 13 Table 1 – Characteristics of patients undergoing stoma reversal N Primary Stoma (%*1) Colostomy (%*1) Underwent enema (%*1) Antegrade enema (%*1) Strictures on enema prior to stoma reversal (%*2) Strictures found during stoma reversal (%*1) Strictures on enema prior to redo-surgery (%*2) Strictures found during redo-surgery (%*2) NEC 94 65 (69%) 12 (13%) 81 (86%) 23(24%) 22 (27%) 20 (21%) 2 (100%)*3 2 (100%)*3 Hirschsprung disease 57 55 (96%) 19 (33%) 20 (35%) 9 (16%) 1 (5%) 0 0 0 Intestinal atresia 30 27 (90%) 5 (19%) 14 (47%) 8 (27%) 1(7%) 1 (3%)*4 1 (100%)*4 1 (100%)*4 Meconium ileus 21 20 (90%) 1(5%) 17 (81%) 7 (33%) 0 0 0 0 Meconium peritonitis 10 9 (90%) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 5 (50%) 0 0 0 0 Gastroschisis with intestinal atresia 7 7 (100%) 1 (14%) 6 (86%) 1 (14%) 0 0 0 0 FIP 5 4 (80%) 1 (20%) 4 (90%) 0 0 0 0 0 Total 224 187 (83%) 40 (18%) 151 (68%) 53 (24%) 24 (16%) 21 (9%) 3 (1%) 3 (1%) *1: % of all patients within this diagnosis. *2: % of the patients who underwent an enema. *3: In two patients reoperation within three months was necessary for treatment of a missed stricture. *4: One patient treated for a duodenal atresia reported two strictures, both detected on enema, which were treated in separate operations.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw