224 Chapter 9 References 1. Hayden GE, Wrenn KW. Chest radiograph vs. computed tomography scan in the evaluation for pneumonia. J Emerg Med 2009;36(3):266-70. 2. Self WH, Courtney DM, McNaughton CD, et al. High discordance of chest x-ray and computed tomography for detection of pulmonary opacities in ED patients: implications for diagnosing pneumonia. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31(2):401-05. 3. Mueller-Lenke N, Rudez J, Staub D, et al. Use of chest radiography in the emergency diagnosis of acute congestive heart failure. Heart 2006;92(5):695-6. 4. Gezer NS, Balci P, Tuna KC, et al. Utility of chest CT after a chest X-ray in patients presenting to the ED with non-traumatic thoracic emergencies. Am J Emerg Med 2017;35(4):623-27. 5. Claessens YE, Debray MP, Tubach F, et al. Early Chest Computed Tomography Scan to Assist Diagnosis and Guide Treatment Decision for Suspected Community-acquired Pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192(8):974-82. 6. Syrjala H, Broas M, Suramo I, et al. High-resolution computed tomography for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27(2):358-63. 7. Kroft LJM, van der Velden L, Giron IH, et al. Added Value of Ultra-low-dose Computed Tomography, Dose Equivalent to Chest X-Ray Radiography, for Diagnosing Chest Pathology. J Thorac Imaging 2019;34(3):179-86. 8. Hart D, Wall BF, Hillier MC, et al. Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, 2008: HPA-CRCE; [updated December 2010]. Available from: https:// assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/340154/HPA-CRCE-012_for_website.pdf accessed 31 July 2021. 9. Backgrounder on Biological Effects of Radiation: U.S. NRC; 2017 [updated July 8 2020]. Available from: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/bio-effectsradiation.html accessed 31 July 2021. 10. Kim Y, Kim YK, Lee BE, et al. Ultra-low-dose CT of the thorax using iterative reconstruction: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204(6):1197202. 11. Taekker M, Kristjansdottir B, Graumann O, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose and ultralow-dose CT in detection of chest pathology: a systematic review. Clin Imag 2021;74:139-48. 12. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017;284(1):228-43. 13. Munden RF, Carter BW, Chiles C, et al. Managing Incidental Findings on Thoracic CT: Mediastinal and Cardiovascular Findings. A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15(8):1087-96. 14. Ferrante di Ruffano L, Hyde CJ, McCaffery KJ, et al. Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2012;344:e686. 15. Fineberg HV. Evaluation of computed tomography: achievement and challenge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978;131(1):1-4. 16. Gazelle GS, Kessler L, Lee DW, et al. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research. Radiology 2011;261(3):692-8. 17. van den Berk IAH, Kanglie MMNP, van Engelen TSR, et al. OPTimal IMAging strategy in patients suspected of non-traumatic pulmonary disease at the emergency department: chest X-ray or ultra-low-dose CT (OPTIMACT)-a randomised controlled trial chest X-ray or ultralow-dose CT at the ED: design and rationale. Diagn Progn Res 2018;2:20. 18. Kanglie MMNP, Bipat S, van den Berk IAH, et al. OPTimal IMAging strategy in patients suspected of non-traumatic pulmonary disease at the emergency department: chest X-ray or ultra-low-dose chest CT (OPTIMACT) trial-statistical analysis plan. Trials 2020;21(1):407.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw