Prophylactic Replacement of Voice Prosthesis | 189 7 17. Lewin JS, Baumgart LM, Barrow MP, Hutcheson KA. Device Life of the Tracheoesopha-geal Voice Prosthesis Revisited. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(1):65-71. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2771 18. Yenigun A, Eren SB, Ozkul MH, Tugrul S, Meric A. Factors influencing the longevity and replacement frequency of Provox voice prostheses. Singapore Medical Journal. 2015;56(11):632-636. doi:10.11622/ smedj.2015173 19. Galli J, Calo L, Meucci D, et al. Biofilm in voice prosthesis: A prospective cohort study and laboratory tests using sonication and SEM analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(5):1260-1265. doi:10.1111/coa.13141 20. Timmermans AJ, Harmsen HJM, Bus-Spoor C, et al. Biofilm formation on the Provox ActiValve: Composition and ingrowth analyzed by Illumina paired-end RNA sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Head Neck. 2016;38 Suppl 1:E432-440. doi:10.1002/hed.24014 21. Hutcheson KA, Lewin JS, Sturgis EM, Kapadia A, Risser J. Enlarged tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2011;33(1):20-30. doi:10.1002/hed.21399 22. Rzepakowska A. Estimation of Benefit From Regular Versus Leakage-Related Exchange of Voice Prosthesis in Patients Post Laryngectomy Considering Complications Rate, Fis-tula Colonization by Candida Species and Patients Satisfaction Feedback. clinicaltri-als.gov; 2020. Accessed November 22, 2021. https:// clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04268459
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw