Chapter 2 36 Table 2.1 – (Continued) First author, year of publication Country Included participants (age range or mean) Study design Measurement of psychiatric disorder Unintended pregnancy assessment Results Takahashi et al., 201238 Japan Pregnant women, aged 1744 years, mean age at inclusion 30.5 years and two mothers were <18 years old Cross-sectional analysis of pregnancy intention in prospective cohort data Past and current history of psychiatric disorders were evaluated at study inclusion and confirmed by trained physicians by use of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) (First, 1996) National Survey of Family Growth64 was used to collect information on pregnancy intention, assessed between 14 and 26 weeks of gestation UPs in mood disorders group versus no mood disorders group: OR 2.05 (CI 1.26-3.33). UPs in anxiety disorders group versus no anxiety disorders group: OR 5.02 (2.19-11.50). UPs in any psychiatric condition group versus no psychiatric condition group: OR 2.10 (1.263.26) Tenkku et al., 200937 US 484 pregnant women aged 20-39 years were included and assessed for psychiatric disorders. A total of 56 women with anxiety disorders, 67 women with mood disorders and 54 women with substance use disorders were included (some participants reported more than one disorder) and 344 women without psychiatric disorders Case-control study Anxiety disorder, mood disorder, substance use disorder and any (other) psychiatric disorders were assessed by use of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version IV65 UP was assessed during pregnancy by a multiple choice question, from the 1999 version of the PRAMS62 UPs anxiety disorders group versus no anxiety disorders group: OR=0.60 (CI 0.341.08). UPs mood disorders group versus no mood disorders group: OR= 0.65 (CI 0.38-1.12). UPs substance use versus no substance use group: OR= 1.12 (CI 0.592.14). UPs any psychiatric condition versus control group: OR 0.83 (CI 0.54-1.28)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw