173 Outcomes Gr T0 n T1 n T2 n Intervention effect T0-T1 Intervention effect T0-T2 B (95% CI) p B (95% CI) p HL knowledge* mean (SD) CAU 5.25 (0.86) 18 5.19 (0.68) 18 5.14 (0.59) 18 0.49 (0.04-0.93) 0.034 0.66 (0.31-1.01) <0.001 IG 4.37 (0.88) 30 5.47 (0.59) 27 5.65 (0.46) 28 Total use of HL strategies mean (SD) CAU 4.48 (0.55) 18 4.54 (0.69) 18 4.64 (0.52) 18 0.64 (0.33-0.95) <0.001 0.56 (0.19-0.93) 0.004 IG 4.15 (0.57) 30 4.89 (0.52) 27 5.03 (0.67) 28 Use of health literacy communication strategies within separate domains: Gathering information mean (SD) CAU 5.22 (0.52) 18 5.31 (0.77) 18 5.44 (0.55) 18 0.43 (0.04-0.81) 0.031 0.17 (-0.22-0.57) 0.385 IG 4.90 (0.66) 30 5.56 (0.55) 27 5.54 (0.68) 28 Providing information mean (SD) CAU 4.60 (0.70) 18 4.64 (0.79) 18 4.77 (0.80) 18 0.38 (0.04-0.73) 0.030 0.40 (-0.05-0.83) 0.077 IG 4.26 (0.67) 30 4.90 (0.41) 27 5.08 (0.67) 28 Shared decision making mean (SD) CAU 4.49 (0.81) 18 4.44 (0.98) 18 4.38 (0.67) 18 0.80 (0.36-1.24) <0.001 0.93 (0.47-1.39) <0.001 IG 3.94 (0.84) 30 4.74 (0.90) 27 4.88 (0.97) 28 Enabling self-management mean (SD) CAU 3.79 (0.91) 18 3.89 (0.83) 18 4.00 (0.72) 18 0.79 (0.40-1.18) <0.001 0.83 (0.38-1.27) <0.001 IG 3.55 (0.73) 30 4.39 (0.78) 27 4.63 (0.87) 28 Table 5.3 Linear regression of primary and secondary professional outcomes for the change between T0-T1 and T0-T2 Numbers in bold indicate significant results. * At T0, there was a significant difference for health literacy knowledge between the IG and CAU (p=0.001). Gr = group, n = number of participants included in the analysis, B = parameter estimate of being in the IG for the difference T1-T0 or T2-T0, CI = confidence interval, HL = health literacy, SD = standard deviation, CAU = care-as-usual, IG = intervention group.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw