137 Patients (n = 4) Healthcare Professionals (n = 17) Grade for intervention # mean ± stdev 7.75 ± 0.957 Grade for intervention # mean ± stdev 7.97 ± 0.910 Usability of the intervention (n) Fit to daily practice (n) Complicated Neutral Easy 0 1 3 Yes Partly No 17 0 0 Complexity of the content (n) Complexity of workshop (n) Complicated Just right Easy 0 3 1 Complicated Just right Easy 0 12 5 Length (n) Length (n) Too long Good Too short 2 2 0 Too long Good Too short 0 10 7 Self-reported effect (n) on: Improved knowledge * mean ± stdev 5.94 ± 0.854 CKD understanding Understanding of consequences Understanding of lifestyle Lifestyle confidence Knowledge on consultation topics Consultation self-efficacy 4 3 1 1 3 2 Usefulness other patients ˆ mean ± stdev 4.00 ± 0.000 Improved self-efficacy * mean ± stdev 5.75 ± 1.000 Usefullness significant others ˆ mean ± stdev 3.75 ± 0.500 Expected strategy use * mean ± stdev 6.13 ± 0.619 n = number of participants, stdev = standard deviation. # Rated between 1–10, as in the Dutch grading system; * Measured with 7-point Likert scales with statements. Answer options ranged from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Maximum possible score = 7. ˆ Measured with 5-point Likert scales with statements. Answer options ranged from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Maximum possible score = 5. Table 4.3 Evaluation of the intervention with patients and health care professionals.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw