2 | 37 22. Mansfield E, Noble N, Sanson-Fisher R, Mazza D, Bryant J. Primary care physicians’ perceived barriers to optimal dementia care: A systematic review. The Gerontologist. 2019;59(6):e697-e708. 23. Dirksen CD. The use of research evidence on patient preferences in health care decisionmaking: issues, controversies and moving forward. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14(6):785-94. 24. Martin S, Kelly S, Khan A, Cullum S, Dening T, Rait G, et al. Attitudes and preferences towards screening for dementia: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15(1):1-12. 25. Parker M, Barlow S, Hoe J, Aitken L. Persistent barriers and facilitators to seeking help for a dementia diagnosis: a systematic review of 30 years of the perspectives of carers and people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020:1-24. 26. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41. 27. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):54653. 28. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on AgingAlzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2011;7(3):263-9. 29. Marshall T, Kinnard EN, Hancock M, King-Jones S, Olson K, Abba-Aji A, et al. Patient engagement, treatment preferences and shared decision-making in the treatment of opioid use disorder in adults: a scoping review protocol. BMJ open. 2018;8(10):e022267. 30. Selva A, Sola I, Zhang Y, Pardo-Hernandez H, Haynes RB, Martinez Garcia L, et al. Development and use of a content search strategy for retrieving studies on patients’ views and preferences. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):126. 31. van Hoorn R, Kievit W, Booth A, Mozygemba K, Lysdahl KB, Refolo P, et al. The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:88. 32. Montori VM, Brito JP, Murad MH. The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines. JAMA. 2013;310(23):2503-4. 33. Schers H, van den Hoogen H, Bor H, Grol R, van den Bosch W. Familiarity with a GP and patients’ evaluations of care. A cross-sectional study. Fam Pract. 2005;22(1):15-9. 34. Pluye P, Gagnon M-P, Griffiths F, Johnson-Lafleur J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(4):529-46. 35. Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Jagosh J, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(1):47-53. 36. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research: sage; 2018. 37. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45. 38. Birt L, Pol, F, Charlesworth G, Leung P, Higgs P. Relational experiences of people seeking help and assessment for subjective cognitive concern and memory loss. Aging Ment Health. 2019. 39. Lee JJY, Barlas J, Thompson CL, Dong YH. Caregivers’ Experience of Decision-Making regarding Diagnostic Assessment following Cognitive Screening of Older Adults. 2018(47). 40. Chrisp TA, Tabberer S, Thomas BD, Goddard WA. Dementia early diagnosis: triggers, supports and constraints affecting the decision to engage with the health care system. Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(5):559-65. 41. Kunneman M, Pel-Littel R, Bouwman FH, Gillissen F, Schoonenboom NSM, Claus JJ, et al. Patients’ and caregivers’ views on conversations and shared decision making in diagnostic testing for Alzheimer’s disease: The ABIDE project. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017;3(3):314-22.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw