28 Chapter 2 Table 1: General study characteristics, training characteristics, quality measures and the evaluation framework. Ref: [7, 11, 32-55] General study characteristics Quality measures First author, year Country Study design Clinical domain Participants # Reporting of outcome Risk of bias/quality score§ (MERSQI) Level of outcome* (Kirkpatrick) Ajayi, 2019 [32] US NCBA Internal and palliative medicine 30 Self-reported by participants 9.5 2,3 Alexander, 2006 [33] US CBA Internal and palliative medicine 56 Objective assessment by observers 12.5 2 Amell, 2022 [7] US NCBA Internal medicine 48 Self-reported by participants; objective assessment by observers 11.5 2 Bhatt, 2016 [34] Ireland NCBA Surgery 57 Self-reported by participants 7.5 1,2 Bieber, 2006 [35] GER CBA; overall study RCT Internal medicine 13 Self-reported by participants; patient experiences 12 2 Bossen, 2022 [36] NL NCBA and CBA Orthopedic surgery 9 (19)# Self-reported by participants; patient experiences; objective measurements of decision aid use 13.5 2,4 Chesney, 2018 [37] Canada NCBA General surgery 18 Self-reported by participants; objective assessment by observers 12 1,2,3 Dion, 2016 [38] Canada NCBA Family medicine 247 Objective assessment through general examination 10 2 Geessink, 2017 [39] NL NCBA Geriatric oncology 5 (11)# Self-reported by participants; patient experiences 14.5 4 Geiger, 2017 [40] GER RCT Multiple1) 38 Self-reported by participants; objective assessment by observers; patient ratings 16 3 Grad, 2022 [41] Canada NCBA Family medicine 73 Self-reported by participants 11 2
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw