110 Chapter 6 References 1. Coulter, A., Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy, 1997. 2(2): p. 112-21. 2. Barratt, A., Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns, 2008. 73(3): p. 40712. 3. Djulbegovic, B. and G.H. Guyatt, Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet, 2017. 390(10092): p. 415-423. 4. Couet, N., et al., Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect, 2015. 18(4): p. 542-61. 5. Stiggelbout, A.M., et al., Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ, 2012. 344: p. e256. 6. Joseph-Williams, N., G. Elwyn, and A. Edwards, Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns, 2014. 94(3): p. 291-309. 7. van Veenendaal, H., et al., Accelerating implementation of shared decision-making in the Netherlands: An exploratory investigation. Patient Educ Couns, 2018. 101(12): p. 2097-104. 8. Scholl, I., et al., Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them - a scoping review. Implement Sci, 2018. 13(1): p. 40. 9. Legare, F., et al., Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014(9): p. CD006732. 10. Waddell, A., et al., Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review. Implement Sci, 2021. 16(1): p. 74. 11. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of innovations. Vol. 5th Ed. 2003, New York: Free Press. 12. Greenhalgh, T., et al., Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q, 2004. 82(4): p. 581-629. 13. Colquhoun, H.L., et al., A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback. Implement Sci, 2013. 8: p. 66. 14. Dearing, J.W., Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development. Res Soc Work Pract, 2009. 19(5): p. 503-518. 15. Lien, A.S. and Y.D. Jiang, Integration of diffusion of innovation theory into diabetes care. J Diabetes Investig, 2017. 8(3): p. 259-260. 16. Rizan, C., et al., General surgeon’s antibiotic stewardship: Climbing the Rogers Diffusion of Innovation Curve-Prospective Cohort Study. Int J Surg, 2017. 40: p. 78-82. 17. Mazotti, L., et al., Diffusion of innovation and longitudinal integrated clerkships: Results of the clerkship directors in internal medicine annual survey. Med Teach, 2019. 41(3): p. 347-353. 18. Benson, T., Digital innovation evaluation: user perceptions of innovation readiness, digital confidence, innovation adoption, user experience and behavior change. BMJ Health Care Inform, 2019. 26(1): p. 0. 19. Spinnewijn, L., et al., Knowing what the patient wants: a hospital ethnography studying physician culture in shared decision making in the Netherlands. BMJ Open, 2020. 10(3): p. e032921. 20. Spinnewijn, L., et al., Structurally collecting patient feedback on trainee skills: A pilot study in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Patient Educ Couns, 2022. 105(5): p. 1276-1282. 21. Gale, N.K., et al., Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2013. 13: p. 117. 22. Pope, C., S. Ziebland, and N. Mays, Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 2000. 320(7227): p. 114-6. 23. Ritchie, J. and I. Spencer, Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Analyzing qualitative data. 1994, London: Routledge. 24. Aarts, J.W.M., et al., Development of an adjective-selection measure evaluating clinicians’ attitudes towards using patient decision aids: The ADOPT measure. Patient Educ Couns, 2022. 105(8): p. 2785-2792. 25. Allen, M. and P. Sage, The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. 1st ed. 2017, Los Angeles, California: SAGE. 26. Myren, B.J., et al., Openness to new perspectives created by patient participation at the morbidity and mortality meeting. Patient Educ Couns, 2021. 104(2): p. 343-351.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw