52 Chapter 3 REFERENCES 1. Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17:232-236. 2. D’haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:293-303. doi: 10.1111/j.17088208.2009.00255.x. 3. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol. 2005;76:503-7. 4. Pettersson A, Komiyama A, Hultin M, Näsström K, Klinge B. Accuracy of Virtually Planned and Template Guided Implant Surgery on Edentate Patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:527-37. doi: 10.1111/j.17088208.2010.00285.x. 5. Vieira DM, Sotto-Maior BS, Barros CA, Reis ES, Francischone CE. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:1347-51. doi: 10.11607/ jomi.3156. 6. Cassetta M, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Stefanelli LV. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:1071-8. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3329. 7. Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Agbaje JO, Schepers S, Politis C, Van Slycke S, Vrielinck L. Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using CBCT-Derived Mucosa-Supported Stereolithographic Template. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:86270. 8. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K, Marchal G, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17:842-52. 9. Block MS, Chandler C. Computed tomography-guided surgery: complications associated with scanning, processing, surgery, and prosthetics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.082. 10. Colombo M, Mangano C, Mijiritsky E, Krebs M, Hauschild U, Fortin T. Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:150. doi: 10.1186/ s12903-017-0441-y. 11. Stübinger S, Buitrago-Tellez C, Cantelmi G. Deviations between placed and planned implant positions: an accuracy pilot study of skeletally supported stereolithographic surgical templates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:54051. doi: 10.1111/cid.12019. 12. Ozan O, Orhan K, Turkyilmaz I. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1755-61. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e6305. 13. Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Naert I, Jacobs R, Teughels W, Quirynen M. Depth and lateral deviations in guided implant surgery: an RCT comparing guided surgery with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:1315-20. doi: 10.1111/ clr.12460. 14. Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:980-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01957.x. 15. Younes F, Eghbali A, De Bruyckere T, Cleymaet R, Cosyn J. A randomized controlled trial on the efficiency of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:131-138. doi: 10.1111/clr.13399. 16. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol. 2010;81:43-51. doi: 10.1902/ jop.2009.090348.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw