Chapter 4 96 4.3.3 ROC analysis The ROC curves of the three different comparisons are presented in figure 3a,b,c and their AUC in table 3 along with the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the MoCA scores of <26 (original cutoff) and <21 (best Youden score for MD). The sensitivity and specificity for the cutoffs from 26 through 18 are presented in table 4. The cutoff scores with the highest Youden index were <20, <21 for MD, <24 for CI and <25 for MCI. Only 50% of those with a positive MoCA (score <21) had MD (PPV), but 94% of those with negative tests were correctly identified as not having dementia (NPV) (table 3). Given the a priori likelihood of MD (28%) in this sample, a NPV of 94% represents a considerable improvement over chance. When using the MoCA for detecting CI (MD+MCI), 90% of the positive tests (<21) correctly identified CI. In clinical practice, a cutoff of <21 resulted in 90% of those with a positive MoCA having CI and 94% of those with a score of ≥21 not having Dementia. In example assessing 100 patients suspected of MD after initial assessment at a cutoff <21 would result in a 50% reduction of referrals compared to triaging only by initial assessment. The amount of FP would be 25 (of whom were 20 MCI), and 3 FN. We further explored the distribution of the MoCA scores with a boxplot of the main groups and the MoCA scores by DSM IV diagnosis (figure 2). Of the demented patients, all of the DLB and mixed causes, and 75% of the vascular and Alzheimer patients scored <21. Three out of five patients with Alzheimer’s that scored ≥21 appeared to have very high education (PhD degree). Of the FTD patients (n=4) 75% scored 21. The median MCI MoCA score was 21. Looking at the etiology of the MCI group, the neurodegenerative patients were responsible for most of the false positives (FP). More or less 50% of the depressed, bipolar and the schizophrenic patients diagnosed with MCI scored <21.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw