Iris Kanera

104 Chapter 4 APPENDIX 4.5 Predictors of a higher perceived personal relevance of the KNW content, N = 182 Perceived personal relevance (1-5) Variable Beta SE [95% CI] p Female gender -.027 .614 [-1.23; 1.18] .964 Age -.123 .221 [-.56; .31] .578 Marital status: with partner .246 .340 [-.54; 1.03] .538 Being employed: yes -.248 .342 [-.92; .42] .468 Education level (low = ref) Medium -.597 .369 [-1.32; .13] .106 High -.698 .368 [-1.42; .02] .058 Breast cancer (other = ref) -.403 .581 [-1.54; .74] .488 Primary cancer treatment (other = ref) Surgery & radiation -.303 .542 [-1.37; .76] .576 Surgery & chemo .600 .464 [-.31; 1.51] .196 Surgery & chemo & radiation .027 .479 [-.91; .97] .955 Number of weeks after completing treatment -.108 .140 [-.38; .17] .439 Participating in aftercare: yes .188 .332 [-.46; .84] .570 Having co-morbidities: yes -.054 .328 [-.70; .59] .868 BMI .013 .149 [-.28; .30] .933 Pseudo R 2 .031 χ 2 14.58 .407 Note: Ordered logistic regression was used. Beta = regression coefficient. Abbreviations: ref: reference group; BMI: Body Mass Index; MRA: Module Referral Advice

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw