Anna Brouwer

References 1. Dawson WW, Trick GL, Litzkow CA. Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1979;18(9):988-991. 2. Beeler P, Barthelmes D, Sutter FK, Helbig H, Fleischhauer JC. Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd . 2007;224(4):265-268. doi:10.1055/s-2007-962856 3. Yin H, Pardue MT. Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing. Doc Ophthalmol . 2004;108(1):77-86. 4. Lachapelle P, Benoit J, Little JM, Lachapelle B. Recording the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram with the DTL electrode. Doc Ophthalmol . 1993;83(2):119-130. doi:10.1007/bf01206210 5. Brûlé J, Lavoie M-P, Casanova C, Lachapelle P, Hébert M. Evidence of a possible impact of the menstrual cycle on the reproducibility of scotopic ERGs in women. Doc Ophthalmol . 2007;114(3):125-134. doi:10.1007/s10633-007-9045-1 6. Westall CA, Dhaliwal HS, Panton CM, et al. Values of electroretinogram responses according to axial length. Doc Ophthalmol . 2001;102(2):115-130. http:/ www.ncbi.nlm . nih.gov/pubmed/11518455 7. Al Abdlseaed A, McTaggart Y, Ramage T, Hamilton R, McCulloch DL. Light- and dark- adapted electroretinograms (ERGs) and ocular pigmentation: comparison of brown- and blue-eyed cohorts. Doc Ophthalmol . 2010;121(2):135-146. doi:10.1007/s10633- 010-9240-3 8. McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, et al. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol . 2015;130(1):1-12. doi:10.1007/ s10633-014-9473-7 9. Hebert M, Vaegan, Lachapelle P. Reproducibility of ERG responses obtained with the DTL electrode. Vision Res . 1999;39(6):1069-1070. 10. García-García Á, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G. Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode. Doc Ophthalmol . 2016;133(2):99-108. doi:10.1007/s10633-016-9560-z 11. Hebert M, Lachapelle P, Dumont M. Reproducibility of electroretinograms recorded with DTL electrodes. Doc Ophthalmol . 1996;91(4):333-342. 12. Kurtenbach A, Kramer S, Strasser T, Zrenner E, Langrova H. The importance of electrode position in visual electrophysiology. Doc Ophthalmol . 2017;134(2):129-134. doi:10.1007/s10633-017-9579-9 13. Fuller DG, Knighton RW, Machemer R. Bright-flash electroretinography for the evaluation of eyes with opaque vitreous. Am J Ophthalmol . 1975;80(2):214-223. http:/ www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1155560 14. Kergoat H, Kergoat MJ, Justino L. Age-related changes in the flash electroretinogram and oscillatory potentials in individuals age 75 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc . 2001;49(9):1212-1217. http:/ www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11559381 15. Wright CE, Williams DE, Drasdo N, Harding GF. The influence of age on the electroretinogram and visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol . 1985;59(4):365-384. http:/ www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4028925 16. Freund PR, Watson J, Gilmour GS, Gaillard F, Sauve Y. Differential changes in retina function with normal aging in humans. Doc Ophthalmol . 2011;122(3):177-190. doi:10.1007/s10633-011-9273-2 152 Chapter 7