Maarten van Egmond

98 Chapter 5 Table 1. Continued Study Design Objective Participants Intervention N (male/ female) Characteristics I: n [age (SD)] C: n [age (SD)] Treatment Ligibel 2012 Multicenter pilot study, randomized 1:1 study Feasibility of a telephone-based exercise inter- vention 121 (9/ 112) Patients after breast, colon or rectal cancer I: 61 [53.1 (10.8)] C: 60 [55.5 ( 10.6)] Tele- phone-based intervention Pinto 2013 RCT Effectiveness of a tele- phone-based intervention 192 (0/192) Patients after breast cancer I: 106 [56.1 ( 9.9)] C: 86 [55.9 ( 9.9)] Health care ad- vice plus tele- phone-coun- selling Pinto 2013 RCT Effectiveness of a tele- phone-based intervention 46 (20/26) Patients after colorectal cancer I: 20 [59.5 (11.2)] C: 26 [55.6 (8.24)] Telephone based physical Activity exer- cise Vonk Noor- degraaf 2014 RCT Effectiveness of an eHealth intervention 215 (0/215) Patients after hysterectomy and/or laparo- scopic adnexal surgery I: 110 [43.5 (7.8)] C: 105 [43.2 ( 8.5)] eHealth pro- gramme Abbreviations: CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; I, intervention; C, control; FU, follow up; MD, mean difference; HR, hazard ratio; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; CR, cardiac rehabilitation; APN, advance practice nurse; QoL, quality of life; TKA, total knee arthroplasty; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous-intensity phys- ical activity; PA, physical activities; MOS, medical outcomes study; SF-36, short form health survey; BAI, Beck anxiety inventory; MSAS, Memorial symptom assessment Scale; VAS, Visual analogue scale; SRQ, shoulder rating questionnaire; SDS, symptom distress scale; SPBB, short physical performance battery; KOOS, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; PSFS, patient specific functional Scale;