Marjolein Dennissen

78 The Herculean task of diversity networks Discussion The aim of this chapter has been to further our knowledge on diversity management practices by applying an intersectionality lens to single category diversity networks. Thus far, the theoretical implications of intersectionality for organization’s diversity management practices have remained an uncharted terrain. Current studies on diversity management practices fail to theorize the heterogeneity within identity categories. Analyzing diversity networks as exemplars of current single category diversity management practices through an intersectionality lens, I developed a better understanding of how single category diversity networks sustain intersectional inequalities in organizations. This allowed me to contribute to the theory on diversity management practices in two ways. First, I identified the dynamics of structural intersectionality in diversity networks, theorizing how these single category networks are inextricably linked with processes of privilege and disadvantage. Second, by introducing the notion of political intersectionality, I gained a better understanding of how diversity networks are hindered by a politics of preserving privilege rather than interrogating it. I conclude this chapter with the implications for diversity management practices in organizations. Dynamics of structural intersectionality in diversity networks My first contribution pertains to the identification of the dynamics of structural intersectionality in single category diversity networks. I showed three possible strategies how individual network members dealt with the single category structure of diversity networks. These strategies illustrate how single identity categories are taken for granted and almost hegemonically accepted. It becomes difficult to question the single category structure, and the vast majority of network members goes along with the categorical organization of diversity networks. Even though some members display their concern with how diversity networks are organized, this is constructed as an individual issue rather than a structural problem. Very few network members try to make room for their multiple identities within diversity networks and actually challenge the single category structure. When single category networks go as unchallenged as they do, multiple intersecting identities remain obscured. This is a dynamic that normalizes the idea of separate identity categories and facilitates the continuous avoidance of the complexity of intersectionality in diversity networks. With the dynamics of structural intersectionality, I showed how single category diversity networks are inextricably linked with processes of privilege and disadvantage. Hitherto, the single category structure of diversity networks has informed research that only examines the impact on disadvantaged identity groups. The predominant focus on disadvantage and oppression leaves the role of privilege underexposed and unmarked (Tatli & Özbilgin, 2012; Verloo, 2009). In line with privilege studies (Ferber, 2012; McIntosh, 2012), my study shows that